Исходное сообщение
"Утечка исходных текстов браузера Opera 12.15" Отправлено arisu, 29-Янв-17 17:20
i'd better avoid using regexps in content blocker: they aren't *that* good in early rejecting, but slower and more memory-demanding. i think it is better to calculate b-m-like «substring presence» tables for patterns, and b-m table for url before checking. b-m table for urls can be cached in the content blocking module, btw, but i don't think that it is really worth the efforts: «domain as key» will take care of most rejects, i believe.

Ваше сообщение
Имя*:
EMail:	Для отправки ответов на email укажите знак ! перед адресом, например, !user@host.ru (!! - не показывать email). Более тонкая настройка отправки ответов производится в профиле зарегистрированного участника форума.
Заголовок*:
Сообщение*:	> i'd better avoid using regexps in content blocker: they aren't *that* good > in early rejecting, but slower and more memory-demanding. i think it > is better to calculate b-m-like «substring presence» tables for patterns, and > b-m table for url before checking. b-m table for urls can > be cached in the content blocking module, btw, but i don't > think that it is really worth the efforts: «domain as key» > will take care of most rejects, i believe.
	Введите код, изображенный на картинке: